Belgian Grand Prix

BacktestGraded

Race Winner Prediction

7.004 km lap length19 cornersLow overtaking difficulty

Race date July 19, 2026 · generated Sep 8, 2026, 2:09 PM UTC · rain scenario weighted at 14%

Predicted vs. Actual

Predicted winner

ANT (21.3%)

Actual winner

ANT (correct)

Podium hits

1 / 3

Brier score (win)

0.0323

The model gave the actual winner (ANT) a 21.3% chance beforehand. This was a blind backtest — generated using only data available before the race, never this race's own results. See the track record page for the model's accuracy across every graded race.

Our model: 0.0323 · Grid-based baseline (always pick the polesitter): 0.0000 (baseline beats the model this time — lower is better)

Where the podium call missed

  • RUS (predicted podium) didn't finish — Retired.
  • HAM (predicted podium) finished P4 instead.
  • LEC finished P2 — the model projected around P6.
  • VER finished P3 — the model projected around P8.

Predicted vs. actual finishing position, every driver

Green, right — finished better than the model expected (underrated). Red, left — finished worse (overrated). Sorted by size of the miss.

Win Probability — Top 10

Error bars show ± 1 standard deviation of win probability across batches of the Monte Carlo simulation — how much this estimate would wobble on a re-run, not a formal confidence interval.

Full Prediction Table

Click a row to see what drove that driver's score.

PosDriverTeamWin %Podium %Points %Exp. PosActual
1▸ANTMercedes21.3%50.3%91.9%4.571
2▸RUSMercedes19%46.7%90.6%4.8722
3▸HAMFerrari15.1%40.9%88.3%5.384
4▸LECFerrari13.3%37.6%86.6%5.682
5▸NORMcLaren8.4%27.9%81%6.697
6▸PIAMcLaren6.4%22.7%76.1%7.45
7▸VERRed Bull4.7%18.4%71.4%8.053
8▸HADRed Bull3.2%13.1%63.2%9.16
9▸LAWRB F1 Team2.5%11.1%59.3%9.5712
10▸GASAlpine F1 Team1.8%8.3%52.4%10.3711
11▸LINRB F1 Team1.3%6.3%46.1%11.159
12▸COLAlpine F1 Team0.7%3.7%34.6%12.5310
13▸BEAHaas F1 Team0.7%4%36.3%12.3214
14▸BORAudi0.4%2.4%26.2%13.718
15▸SAIWilliams0.4%2.1%25%13.8916
16▸OCOHaas F1 Team0.2%1%15.3%15.5417
17▸ALBWilliams0.2%1.4%18.9%14.8515
18▸PERCadillac F1 Team0.1%0.4%6.4%17.7121
19▸STRAston Martin0.1%0.4%6.2%17.820
20▸ALOAston Martin0.1%0.8%12%16.2119
21▸HULAudi0.1%0.3%6.1%17.8413
22▸BOTCadillac F1 Team0%0.3%6.3%17.7818

Methodology

Each driver's simulated race pace is sampled from a distribution weighted by qualifying pace percentile, top-speed ranking, season championship standings, historical finishing position at this circuit, tire degradation, and pit-stop delta. The simulation runs 100,000 times, with 14% of runs treated as a wet-race scenario (estimated from this circuit's own rainfall history).

This circuit's weighting — Belgian Grand Prix: overtaking difficulty Low, downforce dependency Low, tire severity Medium. Higher overtaking difficulty shifts weight toward grid position; lower downforce dependency shifts weight toward straight-line top speed; higher tire severity shifts weight toward tire-degradation management. See circuit_profiles.py for every circuit's numbers and how they translate into weights.