Spanish Grand Prix
GradedRace Winner Prediction
Race date September 13, 2026 · generated Sep 13, 2026, 5:57 PM UTC · rain scenario weighted at 10%
Predicted vs. Actual
Predicted winner
NOR (34.6%)
Actual winner
ANT (missed)
Podium hits
2 / 3
Brier score (win)
0.0392
The model gave the actual winner (ANT) a 20.2% chance beforehand. Predicted live, before the race. See the track record page for the model's accuracy across every graded race.
Our model: 0.0392 · Grid-based baseline (always pick the polesitter): 0.1000 (model beats the baseline — lower is better)
Where the podium call missed
- HAM (predicted podium) didn't finish — Retired.
- VER finished P2 — the model projected around P6.
Predicted vs. actual finishing position, every driver
Green, right — finished better than the model expected (underrated). Red, left — finished worse (overrated). Sorted by size of the miss.
Win Probability — Top 10
Error bars show ± 1 standard deviation of win probability across batches of the Monte Carlo simulation — how much this estimate would wobble on a re-run, not a formal confidence interval.
Full Prediction Table
Click a row to see what drove that driver's score.
| Pos | Driver | Team | Win % | Podium % | Points % | Exp. Pos | Actual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ▸NOR | McLaren | 34.6% ± 0.6% | 67.5% | 96.8% | 3.26 | 3 |
| 2 | ▸ANT | Mercedes | 20.2% ± 0.6% | 52.3% | 93.6% | 4.31 | 1 |
| 3 | ▸HAM | Ferrari | 9.2% ± 0.4% | 31.5% | 84.6% | 6.14 | 22 |
| 4 | ▸VER | Red Bull | 8.1% ± 0.3% | 29.4% | 83.6% | 6.34 | 2 |
| 5 | ▸RUS | Mercedes | 7.5% ± 0.4% | 26.8% | 80.4% | 6.76 | 5 |
| 6 | ▸LEC | Ferrari | 6% ± 0.4% | 23.2% | 77.8% | 7.17 | 4 |
| 7 | ▸PIA | McLaren | 3.7% ± 0.4% | 15.4% | 67.4% | 8.52 | 8 |
| 8 | ▸LAW | Red Bull | 2.8% ± 0.2% | 12.3% | 61.4% | 9.23 | 6 |
| 9 | ▸COL | Alpine F1 Team | 1.7% ± 0.1% | 8.2% | 51% | 10.44 | 7 |
| 10 | ▸LIN | RB F1 Team | 1.7% ± 0.1% | 8.1% | 50.5% | 10.53 | 9 |
| 11 | ▸HUL | Audi | 1% ± 0.1% | 5.2% | 39.4% | 11.85 | 10 |
| 12 | ▸GAS | Alpine F1 Team | 1% ± 0.1% | 5.3% | 42.1% | 11.51 | 12 |
| 13 | ▸BOR | Audi | 0.9% ± 0.1% | 5.2% | 40% | 11.77 | 13 |
| 14 | ▸OCO | Haas F1 Team | 0.4% ± 0.1% | 2.6% | 27.3% | 13.37 | 11 |
| 15 | ▸ALB | Williams | 0.3% ± 0.1% | 1.8% | 23.3% | 13.85 | 15 |
| 16 | ▸SAI | Williams | 0.3% ± 0.1% | 1.8% | 24.2% | 13.73 | 19 |
| 17 | ▸TSU | RB F1 Team | 0.2% ± 0.1% | 1.4% | 19.9% | 14.39 | 14 |
| 18 | ▸ALO | Aston Martin | 0.1% ± 0.1% | 1% | 16.6% | 14.83 | 17 |
| 19 | ▸PER | Cadillac F1 Team | 0.1% | 0.5% | 10.7% | 15.88 | 20 |
| 20 | ▸BOT | Cadillac F1 Team | 0.1% | 0.4% | 9.4% | 16.12 | 18 |
Methodology
Each driver's simulated race pace is sampled from a distribution weighted by qualifying pace percentile, top-speed ranking, season championship standings, historical finishing position at this circuit, tire degradation, and pit-stop delta. The simulation runs 100,000 times, with 10% of runs treated as a wet-race scenario (estimated from this circuit's own rainfall history).
This circuit's weighting — Spanish Grand Prix: overtaking difficulty Medium, downforce dependency Medium, tire severity Medium. Higher overtaking difficulty shifts weight toward grid position; lower downforce dependency shifts weight toward straight-line top speed; higher tire severity shifts weight toward tire-degradation management. See circuit_profiles.py for every circuit's numbers and how they translate into weights.