Azerbaijan Grand Prix

Graded

Race Winner Prediction

6.003 km lap length20 cornersMedium overtaking difficulty

Race date September 26, 2026 · generated Sep 26, 2026, 3:45 PM UTC · rain scenario weighted at 0%

Predicted vs. Actual

Predicted winner

RUS (34.5%)

Actual winner

RUS (correct)

Podium hits

1 / 3

Brier score (win)

0.0226

The model gave the actual winner (RUS) a 34.5% chance beforehand. Predicted live, before the race. See the track record page for the model's accuracy across every graded race.

Our model: 0.0226 · Grid-based baseline (always pick the polesitter): 0.0000 (baseline beats the model this time — lower is better)

Where the podium call missed

  • HAM (predicted podium) finished P6 instead.
  • LEC (predicted podium) finished P4 instead.
  • VER finished P2 — the model projected around P7.
  • HAD finished P3 — the model projected around P7.

Predicted vs. actual finishing position, every driver

Green, right — finished better than the model expected (underrated). Red, left — finished worse (overrated). Sorted by size of the miss.

Win Probability — Top 10

Error bars show ± 1 standard deviation of win probability across batches of the Monte Carlo simulation — how much this estimate would wobble on a re-run, not a formal confidence interval.

Full Prediction Table

Click a row to see what drove that driver's score.

PosDriverTeamWin %Podium %Points %Exp. PosActual
1▸RUSMercedes34.5% ± 0.7%68.8%99%2.991
2▸HAMFerrari14.4% ± 0.4%42.6%94.7%4.736
3▸LECFerrari11.9% ± 0.4%39.1%94.9%4.894
4▸NORMcLaren11.8% ± 0.5%37.8%93.6%5.0619
5▸ANTMercedes10.9% ± 0.5%34.6%91.5%5.415
6▸PIAMcLaren5.2% ± 0.3%21.9%87.2%6.4614
7▸VERRed Bull5% ± 0.3%20.5%82.9%6.92
8▸HADRed Bull3.1% ± 0.2%15.2%80.6%7.383
9▸LAWRB F1 Team1.2% ± 0.1%6.4%56.4%9.8812
10▸GASAlpine F1 Team1.1% ± 0.1%6.3%60%9.5518
11▸COLAlpine F1 Team0.3% ± 0.1%2.3%37.6%11.7417
12▸BEAHaas F1 Team0.2% ± 0.1%1.6%30.3%12.579
13▸LINRB F1 Team0.2% ± 0.1%1.8%33.9%12.127
14▸SAIWilliams0.1%0.5%17%14.2210
15▸OCOHaas F1 Team0%0.1%4.8%16.938
16▸ALBWilliams0%0.2%9.5%15.7320
17▸BORAudi0%0.3%13.9%14.6513
18▸HULAudi0%0.1%8.9%15.611
19▸ALOAston Martin0%0%2.2%17.7921
20▸PERCadillac F1 Team0%0%0.6%19.2315
21▸STRAston Martin0%0%0.3%19.5522
22▸BOTCadillac F1 Team0%0%0.3%19.6416

Methodology

Each driver's simulated race pace is sampled from a distribution weighted by qualifying pace percentile, top-speed ranking, season championship standings, historical finishing position at this circuit, tire degradation, and pit-stop delta. The simulation runs 100,000 times, with 0% of runs treated as a wet-race scenario (estimated from this circuit's own rainfall history).

This circuit's weighting — Azerbaijan Grand Prix: overtaking difficulty Medium, downforce dependency Low, tire severity Medium. Higher overtaking difficulty shifts weight toward grid position; lower downforce dependency shifts weight toward straight-line top speed; higher tire severity shifts weight toward tire-degradation management. See circuit_profiles.py for every circuit's numbers and how they translate into weights.