Azerbaijan Grand Prix
GradedRace Winner Prediction
Race date September 26, 2026 · generated Sep 26, 2026, 3:45 PM UTC · rain scenario weighted at 0%
Predicted vs. Actual
Predicted winner
RUS (34.5%)
Actual winner
RUS (correct)
Podium hits
1 / 3
Brier score (win)
0.0226
The model gave the actual winner (RUS) a 34.5% chance beforehand. Predicted live, before the race. See the track record page for the model's accuracy across every graded race.
Our model: 0.0226 · Grid-based baseline (always pick the polesitter): 0.0000 (baseline beats the model this time — lower is better)
Where the podium call missed
- HAM (predicted podium) finished P6 instead.
- LEC (predicted podium) finished P4 instead.
- VER finished P2 — the model projected around P7.
- HAD finished P3 — the model projected around P7.
Predicted vs. actual finishing position, every driver
Green, right — finished better than the model expected (underrated). Red, left — finished worse (overrated). Sorted by size of the miss.
Win Probability — Top 10
Error bars show ± 1 standard deviation of win probability across batches of the Monte Carlo simulation — how much this estimate would wobble on a re-run, not a formal confidence interval.
Full Prediction Table
Click a row to see what drove that driver's score.
| Pos | Driver | Team | Win % | Podium % | Points % | Exp. Pos | Actual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ▸RUS | Mercedes | 34.5% ± 0.7% | 68.8% | 99% | 2.99 | 1 |
| 2 | ▸HAM | Ferrari | 14.4% ± 0.4% | 42.6% | 94.7% | 4.73 | 6 |
| 3 | ▸LEC | Ferrari | 11.9% ± 0.4% | 39.1% | 94.9% | 4.89 | 4 |
| 4 | ▸NOR | McLaren | 11.8% ± 0.5% | 37.8% | 93.6% | 5.06 | 19 |
| 5 | ▸ANT | Mercedes | 10.9% ± 0.5% | 34.6% | 91.5% | 5.41 | 5 |
| 6 | ▸PIA | McLaren | 5.2% ± 0.3% | 21.9% | 87.2% | 6.46 | 14 |
| 7 | ▸VER | Red Bull | 5% ± 0.3% | 20.5% | 82.9% | 6.9 | 2 |
| 8 | ▸HAD | Red Bull | 3.1% ± 0.2% | 15.2% | 80.6% | 7.38 | 3 |
| 9 | ▸LAW | RB F1 Team | 1.2% ± 0.1% | 6.4% | 56.4% | 9.88 | 12 |
| 10 | ▸GAS | Alpine F1 Team | 1.1% ± 0.1% | 6.3% | 60% | 9.55 | 18 |
| 11 | ▸COL | Alpine F1 Team | 0.3% ± 0.1% | 2.3% | 37.6% | 11.74 | 17 |
| 12 | ▸BEA | Haas F1 Team | 0.2% ± 0.1% | 1.6% | 30.3% | 12.57 | 9 |
| 13 | ▸LIN | RB F1 Team | 0.2% ± 0.1% | 1.8% | 33.9% | 12.12 | 7 |
| 14 | ▸SAI | Williams | 0.1% | 0.5% | 17% | 14.22 | 10 |
| 15 | ▸OCO | Haas F1 Team | 0% | 0.1% | 4.8% | 16.93 | 8 |
| 16 | ▸ALB | Williams | 0% | 0.2% | 9.5% | 15.73 | 20 |
| 17 | ▸BOR | Audi | 0% | 0.3% | 13.9% | 14.65 | 13 |
| 18 | ▸HUL | Audi | 0% | 0.1% | 8.9% | 15.6 | 11 |
| 19 | ▸ALO | Aston Martin | 0% | 0% | 2.2% | 17.79 | 21 |
| 20 | ▸PER | Cadillac F1 Team | 0% | 0% | 0.6% | 19.23 | 15 |
| 21 | ▸STR | Aston Martin | 0% | 0% | 0.3% | 19.55 | 22 |
| 22 | ▸BOT | Cadillac F1 Team | 0% | 0% | 0.3% | 19.64 | 16 |
Methodology
Each driver's simulated race pace is sampled from a distribution weighted by qualifying pace percentile, top-speed ranking, season championship standings, historical finishing position at this circuit, tire degradation, and pit-stop delta. The simulation runs 100,000 times, with 0% of runs treated as a wet-race scenario (estimated from this circuit's own rainfall history).
This circuit's weighting — Azerbaijan Grand Prix: overtaking difficulty Medium, downforce dependency Low, tire severity Medium. Higher overtaking difficulty shifts weight toward grid position; lower downforce dependency shifts weight toward straight-line top speed; higher tire severity shifts weight toward tire-degradation management. See circuit_profiles.py for every circuit's numbers and how they translate into weights.