Hungarian Grand Prix
BacktestGradedRace Winner Prediction
Race date July 26, 2026 · generated Sep 8, 2026, 2:11 PM UTC · rain scenario weighted at 0%
Predicted vs. Actual
Predicted winner
ANT (33.2%)
Actual winner
NOR (missed)
Podium hits
1 / 3
Brier score (win)
0.0476
The model gave the actual winner (NOR) a 7% chance beforehand. This was a blind backtest — generated using only data available before the race, never this race's own results. See the track record page for the model's accuracy across every graded race.
Our model: 0.0476 · Grid-based baseline (always pick the polesitter): 0.0000 (baseline beats the model this time — lower is better)
Where the podium call missed
- HAM (predicted podium) finished P5 instead.
- RUS (predicted podium) finished P7 instead.
- NOR finished P1 — the model projected around P6.
- VER finished P2 — the model projected around P7.
Predicted vs. actual finishing position, every driver
Green, right — finished better than the model expected (underrated). Red, left — finished worse (overrated). Sorted by size of the miss.
Win Probability — Top 10
Error bars show ± 1 standard deviation of win probability across batches of the Monte Carlo simulation — how much this estimate would wobble on a re-run, not a formal confidence interval.
Full Prediction Table
Click a row to see what drove that driver's score.
| Pos | Driver | Team | Win % | Podium % | Points % | Exp. Pos | Actual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ▸ANT | Mercedes | 33.2% | 66.6% | 97.7% | 3.22 | 3 |
| 2 | ▸HAM | Ferrari | 19% | 50.6% | 94.8% | 4.29 | 5 |
| 3 | ▸RUS | Mercedes | 12.6% | 39.1% | 91% | 5.2 | 7 |
| 4 | ▸LEC | Ferrari | 11.9% | 37.5% | 90.7% | 5.3 | 4 |
| 5 | ▸NOR | McLaren | 7% | 27.1% | 84.8% | 6.36 | 1 |
| 6 | ▸PIA | McLaren | 5.6% | 22.5% | 81.5% | 6.88 | 20 |
| 7 | ▸VER | Red Bull | 4.3% | 18.6% | 77.4% | 7.45 | 2 |
| 8 | ▸HAD | Red Bull | 2.4% | 11.9% | 67.6% | 8.67 | 6 |
| 9 | ▸LAW | RB F1 Team | 1.6% | 8.5% | 60.5% | 9.49 | 8 |
| 10 | ▸GAS | Alpine F1 Team | 0.9% | 5.9% | 51.8% | 10.44 | 12 |
| 11 | ▸LIN | RB F1 Team | 0.7% | 4.2% | 44.9% | 11.18 | 10 |
| 12 | ▸COL | Alpine F1 Team | 0.3% | 2.6% | 36% | 12.21 | 15 |
| 13 | ▸BEA | Haas F1 Team | 0.2% | 1.7% | 29% | 13.09 | 19 |
| 14 | ▸BOR | Audi | 0.2% | 1.4% | 26.5% | 13.43 | 11 |
| 15 | ▸SAI | Williams | 0.1% | 0.8% | 20% | 14.37 | 18 |
| 16 | ▸ALB | Williams | 0.1% | 0.5% | 14.5% | 15.28 | 17 |
| 17 | ▸HUL | Audi | 0% | 0% | 3.1% | 18.37 | 9 |
| 18 | ▸OCO | Haas F1 Team | 0% | 0.3% | 10.6% | 16.07 | 16 |
| 19 | ▸BOT | Cadillac F1 Team | 0% | 0% | 3.1% | 18.38 | 22 |
| 20 | ▸ALO | Aston Martin | 0% | 0.2% | 8.2% | 16.65 | 14 |
| 21 | ▸STR | Aston Martin | 0% | 0% | 3.1% | 18.36 | 13 |
| 22 | ▸PER | Cadillac F1 Team | 0% | 0% | 3.2% | 18.3 | 21 |
Methodology
Each driver's simulated race pace is sampled from a distribution weighted by qualifying pace percentile, top-speed ranking, season championship standings, historical finishing position at this circuit, tire degradation, and pit-stop delta. The simulation runs 100,000 times, with 0% of runs treated as a wet-race scenario (estimated from this circuit's own rainfall history).
This circuit's weighting — Hungarian Grand Prix: overtaking difficulty High, downforce dependency High, tire severity Medium. Higher overtaking difficulty shifts weight toward grid position; lower downforce dependency shifts weight toward straight-line top speed; higher tire severity shifts weight toward tire-degradation management. See circuit_profiles.py for every circuit's numbers and how they translate into weights.