Italian Grand Prix
BacktestGradedRace Winner Prediction
Race date September 6, 2026 · generated Sep 8, 2026, 2:57 PM UTC · rain scenario weighted at 0%
Predicted vs. Actual
Predicted winner
ANT (24.1%)
Actual winner
ANT (correct)
Podium hits
2 / 3
Brier score (win)
0.0302
The model gave the actual winner (ANT) a 24.1% chance beforehand. This was a blind backtest — generated using only data available before the race, never this race's own results. See the track record page for the model's accuracy across every graded race.
Our model: 0.0302 · Grid-based baseline (always pick the polesitter): 0.0909 (model beats the baseline — lower is better)
Where the podium call missed
- HAM (predicted podium) finished P6 instead.
- VER finished P3 — the model projected around P7.
Predicted vs. actual finishing position, every driver
Green, right — finished better than the model expected (underrated). Red, left — finished worse (overrated). Sorted by size of the miss.
Win Probability — Top 10
Error bars show ± 1 standard deviation of win probability across batches of the Monte Carlo simulation — how much this estimate would wobble on a re-run, not a formal confidence interval.
Full Prediction Table
Click a row to see what drove that driver's score.
| Pos | Driver | Team | Win % | Podium % | Points % | Exp. Pos | Actual |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ▸ANT | Mercedes | 24.1% ± 0.6% | 54.4% | 94.2% | 4.15 | 1 |
| 2 | ▸RUS | Mercedes | 16.8% ± 0.4% | 44.2% | 90.8% | 4.97 | 2 |
| 3 | ▸HAM | Ferrari | 16.6% ± 0.5% | 44.1% | 90.8% | 4.97 | 6 |
| 4 | ▸NOR | McLaren | 13% ± 0.5% | 37.5% | 87.8% | 5.56 | 4 |
| 5 | ▸LEC | Ferrari | 8.6% ± 0.4% | 28.5% | 82.4% | 6.5 | 22 |
| 6 | ▸VER | Red Bull | 6.3% ± 0.4% | 22.8% | 77% | 7.3 | 3 |
| 7 | ▸PIA | McLaren | 4.7% ± 0.3% | 18.2% | 72.2% | 7.95 | 5 |
| 8 | ▸LAW | Red Bull | 3.1% ± 0.2% | 13.6% | 65.2% | 8.85 | 14 |
| 9 | ▸GAS | Alpine F1 Team | 2.2% ± 0.2% | 10.3% | 58.7% | 9.63 | 7 |
| 10 | ▸LIN | RB F1 Team | 1.5% ± 0.2% | 7.7% | 52.3% | 10.39 | 8 |
| 11 | ▸COL | Alpine F1 Team | 1% ± 0.1% | 5.5% | 45.2% | 11.24 | 9 |
| 12 | ▸BEA | Haas F1 Team | 0.7% ± 0.1% | 4.1% | 38.9% | 11.98 | 15 |
| 13 | ▸BOR | Audi | 0.5% ± 0.1% | 3.1% | 33.5% | 12.66 | 11 |
| 14 | ▸HUL | Audi | 0.3% ± 0.1% | 1.7% | 24.4% | 13.94 | 12 |
| 15 | ▸SAI | Williams | 0.2% ± 0.1% | 1.8% | 25.4% | 13.78 | 13 |
| 16 | ▸ALO | Aston Martin | 0.1% | 0.5% | 11.8% | 16.13 | 21 |
| 17 | ▸ALB | Williams | 0.1% ± 0.1% | 1% | 17.9% | 14.96 | 17 |
| 18 | ▸TSU | RB F1 Team | 0% | 0.1% | 4.7% | 18.09 | 10 |
| 19 | ▸BOT | Cadillac F1 Team | 0% | 0.1% | 5.1% | 17.92 | 19 |
| 20 | ▸PER | Cadillac F1 Team | 0% | 0.1% | 5.3% | 17.88 | 18 |
| 21 | ▸STR | Aston Martin | 0% | 0.1% | 4.8% | 18.03 | 20 |
| 22 | ▸OCO | Haas F1 Team | 0% | 0.5% | 11.9% | 16.11 | 16 |
Methodology
Each driver's simulated race pace is sampled from a distribution weighted by qualifying pace percentile, top-speed ranking, season championship standings, historical finishing position at this circuit, tire degradation, and pit-stop delta. The simulation runs 100,000 times, with 0% of runs treated as a wet-race scenario (estimated from this circuit's own rainfall history).
This circuit's weighting — Italian Grand Prix: overtaking difficulty Low, downforce dependency Low, tire severity Low. Higher overtaking difficulty shifts weight toward grid position; lower downforce dependency shifts weight toward straight-line top speed; higher tire severity shifts weight toward tire-degradation management. See circuit_profiles.py for every circuit's numbers and how they translate into weights.