Italian Grand Prix

BacktestGraded

Race Winner Prediction

5.793 km lap length11 cornersLow overtaking difficulty

Race date September 6, 2026 · generated Sep 8, 2026, 2:57 PM UTC · rain scenario weighted at 0%

Predicted vs. Actual

Predicted winner

ANT (24.1%)

Actual winner

ANT (correct)

Podium hits

2 / 3

Brier score (win)

0.0302

The model gave the actual winner (ANT) a 24.1% chance beforehand. This was a blind backtest — generated using only data available before the race, never this race's own results. See the track record page for the model's accuracy across every graded race.

Our model: 0.0302 · Grid-based baseline (always pick the polesitter): 0.0909 (model beats the baseline — lower is better)

Where the podium call missed

  • HAM (predicted podium) finished P6 instead.
  • VER finished P3 — the model projected around P7.

Predicted vs. actual finishing position, every driver

Green, right — finished better than the model expected (underrated). Red, left — finished worse (overrated). Sorted by size of the miss.

Win Probability — Top 10

Error bars show ± 1 standard deviation of win probability across batches of the Monte Carlo simulation — how much this estimate would wobble on a re-run, not a formal confidence interval.

Full Prediction Table

Click a row to see what drove that driver's score.

PosDriverTeamWin %Podium %Points %Exp. PosActual
1▸ANTMercedes24.1% ± 0.6%54.4%94.2%4.151
2▸RUSMercedes16.8% ± 0.4%44.2%90.8%4.972
3▸HAMFerrari16.6% ± 0.5%44.1%90.8%4.976
4▸NORMcLaren13% ± 0.5%37.5%87.8%5.564
5▸LECFerrari8.6% ± 0.4%28.5%82.4%6.522
6▸VERRed Bull6.3% ± 0.4%22.8%77%7.33
7▸PIAMcLaren4.7% ± 0.3%18.2%72.2%7.955
8▸LAWRed Bull3.1% ± 0.2%13.6%65.2%8.8514
9▸GASAlpine F1 Team2.2% ± 0.2%10.3%58.7%9.637
10▸LINRB F1 Team1.5% ± 0.2%7.7%52.3%10.398
11▸COLAlpine F1 Team1% ± 0.1%5.5%45.2%11.249
12▸BEAHaas F1 Team0.7% ± 0.1%4.1%38.9%11.9815
13▸BORAudi0.5% ± 0.1%3.1%33.5%12.6611
14▸HULAudi0.3% ± 0.1%1.7%24.4%13.9412
15▸SAIWilliams0.2% ± 0.1%1.8%25.4%13.7813
16▸ALOAston Martin0.1%0.5%11.8%16.1321
17▸ALBWilliams0.1% ± 0.1%1%17.9%14.9617
18▸TSURB F1 Team0%0.1%4.7%18.0910
19▸BOTCadillac F1 Team0%0.1%5.1%17.9219
20▸PERCadillac F1 Team0%0.1%5.3%17.8818
21▸STRAston Martin0%0.1%4.8%18.0320
22▸OCOHaas F1 Team0%0.5%11.9%16.1116

Methodology

Each driver's simulated race pace is sampled from a distribution weighted by qualifying pace percentile, top-speed ranking, season championship standings, historical finishing position at this circuit, tire degradation, and pit-stop delta. The simulation runs 100,000 times, with 0% of runs treated as a wet-race scenario (estimated from this circuit's own rainfall history).

This circuit's weighting — Italian Grand Prix: overtaking difficulty Low, downforce dependency Low, tire severity Low. Higher overtaking difficulty shifts weight toward grid position; lower downforce dependency shifts weight toward straight-line top speed; higher tire severity shifts weight toward tire-degradation management. See circuit_profiles.py for every circuit's numbers and how they translate into weights.